Debate Between The Epicureans And The Stoics Term Paper

Debate Between The Epicureans And The Stoics - full term Paper ExampleThe Epicureans were contri neverthelessed by Epicurus who was a Greek philosopher who lie withd between 341 BC and 270 BC. Epicurus founded the Garden in capital of Greece in which he and his followers lived and practiced Epicurus philosophical ways of conduct. At the entrance of this place, they hanged a committal to writing stating that Stranger, here you will do well to tarry. Here our highest good is pleasure1. From this writing among others, the Epicureans argon considered hedonists who commit that gentleity should fulfill their globely desires and pleasures and should never try or live according to the will of divinity in the same way as the Stoics. In other words, they note that humanity should try to live in some sort of happiness and pleasure firearm they are still on earth or before their death. Notably, the contribution attributed to these two initiates of estimations passel be narrowed down to the Aristotelian school of thought that dictates that the sort of person one is and the lifestyle one adopts will indeed have an conterminous bearing on the actions one performs. Nonetheless, the Stoic is more plausible than the Epicureans school of thought. The Epicurean school of thought is divided into two axial lines of desires including instinctive and un indispensable fulfillments. Some of these fulfillments may be considered necessary in life while others are considered gratuitous. Form these distinctions it is apparent only some of the inseparable and necessary desires can be fulfilled while the other branch of categories, the un immanent and unnecessary desires are irrelevant and cannot be fulfilled. Nearly all the unnatural and unnecessary class of desires prescribed by Epicureans never exists. This is because only what natural desires are truly necessary and they are what exist. In other words, even the natural and unnecessary desires are never vital to the human l ife thus, they must be considered void since they never satisfy human needs but they can only lead to confusion and disturbance of inner self capable or the autarkeia2. Notably, from this classification of desires, it is apparent that their something or desires that are never necessary in human life and living them as means of self-fulfillment will only lead to destabilization of an individuals inner self sufficiency. These two schools of thoughts also address their concerns on pleasure. Epicureanism classifies sexual intercourse as natural but unnecessary desire. In this case, Epicurus does not spell out total abstinence from sexual pleasures, but he thinks that such pleasure should be sampled carefully so that they are not confused with natural and necessary human desires. Epicurus once stated Sexual intercourse never helped anyone, and one must be satisfied if it has not harmed3. In other words, he was noting that natural but unnecessary desires should be enjoyed while balancing such acts carefully in clear thinking minds. According Epicurus, for an individual To enjoy these unnecessary desires and to not make of them necessities, to take free pleasure in the unnecessary, this is the highest achievement4. However, this contribution varies Stoics that states that former believes makes make a person more virtuous that they can easily and effective sample natural and unnecessary without them existence overwhelmed by these choices. In other words, Stoics contributes the fact that all human desires are governed by some natural forces that humanity must be answerable to thus, it worth examining and individuals experience in order to define his or her next move. Additionally, Stoics argue that pleasure may lead threaten an individual tranquility thus, it should be avoided at all costs. Additionally, other than pleasure, these two schools o