A Philosophic Challenge Essay -- Theory of Evolution, Darwin, DNA

Did you know the odds of proteins necessary to create a maroon of DNA lining up in order naturally be only once in 4x10022 years? (Werner 104). Thats highly marvellous Darwin didnt anticipate that future discoveries would disprove the fundamental tenants of his speculation of evolution. forward-looking science is repeatedly uncovering express that Darwinian evolution cannot be the explanation for life on earth because it relies on an implausible involve of spontaneous generation, leaves gaps in the fossil record, and is contradicted by emerging scientific discoveries. extemporary generation refers to the theory that the setoff life form evolved rapidly bring out of nothing, and all organisms evolved gradually from the original life form. Mounting consequence makes the inclination for spontaneous generation untenable. No biological phyla (a level of organism classification) postulate yet been discovered to support Darwins theory. Even more condemnatory is that Darwin und erstood taxonomy (the classification of living organisms), but he refused to acknowledge or account for the gaps in his theory (Wilker 24). For example, spontaneous generation, a necessary laying claim in Darwins theory, cannot explain how proteins are form. Evolutionists suggest that either proteins or DNA were involved in the first living organism. However, proteins cannot be formed naturally, yet are required for DNA (Werner 105). This raises the chicken and egg question, which came first? Evolutionists cannot explain this, providing no justification for how proteins and DNA could have been involved in spontaneous generation. Amino acids, the building blocks of proteins, would have had to form naturally to endure for the possibility of spontaneous generation. Yet, an experiment conducte... ...naturalists for using the existence of vestigial organs as an argument for evolution, stating vestigial organs provide no evince for evolutionary theory. (qtd. in Wells, Why Darwinism) M ore and more scientific evidence is overturning the biologically based arguments used to support Darwins theory. Darwins theory falls short of fulfilling explanations for the beginning of life. Darwins suggestion that life is ad lib generated is a leap of faith not supported by science. The fossil record is full of gaps that Darwins theory cannot explain, and new discoveries in biota undermine the basis the of evolutionary theory. While Darwins theory may have initially seemed plausible when it was first published, modern science has provided evidence that the foundations and hypotheses on which Darwins theory of evolution are based cannot by chance be true.