Sat Scores Vs. Acceptance Rates :: essays research papers

SAT Scores versus Acknowledgment Rates      The test must satisfy two objectives: (1) to deliver an expert report of your trial, and (2) to show your comprehension of the points identified with least squares relapse as depicted in Moore & McCabe, Chapter 2. In this test, I will decide if there is a relationship between normal SAT scores of approaching green beans versus the acknowledgment pace of candidates at top colleges in the nation. The cases being utilized are 12 of the absolute best colleges in the nation as indicated by US News & World Report. The normal SAT scores of approaching green beans are the logical factors. The reaction variable is the acknowledgment pace of the colleges.      I utilized September 16, 1996 issue of US News & World Report as my source. I began by picking the main fourteen "Best National Universities". Next, I diagramed the fourteen schools utilizing a scatterplot and chose to chop it down to 12 colleges by tossing out odd information. A scatterplot of the 12 colleges information is on the accompanying (page 2) The direct relapse condition is: Acknowledgment = 212.5 + - .134 * SAT_SCORE R= - .632 R^2=.399 I connected the information into my adding machine, and did the different relapses. I saw that the force relapse had the best connection of the non-straight changes. A scatterplot of the change can be seen on page 4. The Power Regression Equation is Acknowledgment RATE=(2.475x10^23)(SAT SCORE)^-7.002 R= - .683 R^2=.466 The force relapse is by all accounts the better model for the examination that I have picked. There is a higher connection in the force change than there is in the direct relapse model. The R for the direct model is - .632 and the R in the force change is - .683. In view of R^2 which quantifies the portion of the variety in the estimations of y that is clarified by the least-squares relapse of y on x, the force change model has a higher R^2 which is . 466 contrasted with .399. The leftover plot for the direct relapse is on page 5 what's more, the lingering plot for the force relapse is on page 6. The two residuals plots appear to be fundamentally the same as each other and no accommodating perceptions can be seen from them. The anomalies in the two models was not a factor in picking the best model. In the two models, there was one unmistakable exception which showed up in the charts.      The one exception in the two models was University of Chicago. It had an uncommonly high acknowledgment rate among the colleges in this analysis. This school is a generally excellent school scholastically which implies the normal SAT scores of

Julius Caesar Essays (861 words) - Julius Caesar, Iulii, Cleopatra

Julius Caesar The period of Julius Caesar was when numerous individuals' emotions toward the government started to change. This was one of the main occasions in Roman history at the point when individuals started to scrutinize the intensity of their ruler. In the play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, we see a concise image of this Roman life during the hour of the First Triumvirate. In this depiction, numerous lamentable things happen because of these solid sentiments towards the legislature of that time. Shakespeare gives us that numerous individuals attempt to evade what's on the horizon, for example, sad things, by being eccentric. Odd notion appears to assume a job in the essential day by day life of most Roman residents, and exists as a significant, integral factor in the occasions and result of the play itself. The setting of the principal scene of the play is based upon strange notion. The Feast of Lupercal is out of appreciation for the god Pan, the sovereign of richness. During this time, fruitless females should have the option to multiply, and prolific ones should have the option to tolerate more. It is additionally a assumed time of sexual glorification and joy. Different scenes delineate how strange sooth-sayers, who are as far as anyone knows enabled to anticipate the future, meander the avenues of Rome. Directing what is to come through short goodies, these individuals may likewise be viewed as odd. In the opening scene, one sooth-sayer, old in his years, cautions Caesar to Be careful the Ides of March, a counsel of Caesar's approaching passing. In spite of the fact that sooth-sayers are viewed by numerous individuals as crazy, withdrawn lower classmen, a decent arrangement of them, clearly including the sayer Caesar experienced, are for sure right on the mark. Since they do not have any conventional office or shop, and they foresee forthcomings without charge, one can see effectively why residents would doubt their expectations. Odd notion, when all is said in done components, for example, the Feast of Lupercal, as well as on an individual level, for example, with the sooth-sayers, is a significant factor in deciding the occasions and the result of The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, and a critical power all through the whole course of the play. Previously the play completely unwinds, we see different indications of Caesar's heartbreaking end. Beside the sooth-sayer's admonition, we see another sign during Caesar's encounter with the Augerers, the modern clairvoyants. They discover No heart in the mammoth, which they decipher as guidance to Caesar that he ought to stay at home. Caesar forgets about it and considers it a reprimand from the divine beings, which means that he is a weakling in the event that he doesn't go out, thus he excuses the insightful exhortation as noise. In any case, the following morning, his better half Calpurnia awakens terrified because of an unpleasant bad dream. She tells Caesar of a fight breaking out in the heart of Rome, Which showered blood upon the Capitol, with Caesar agonizingly biting the dust, with the end goal that ...The sky themselves blast forward the demise of sovereigns. Although Caesar acknowledges Calpurnia is genuinely worried about his prosperity, he looks for another translation, reaching the resolution that the individual who envisions the fantasy may not be the smartest one to decipher it's which means. Later Caesar informs his devoted partner Decius regarding it, and he deciphers it a remarkable opposite, That it was a dream reasonable and lucky, and undoubtedly, today is a perfect day to go out, since this is the day To give a crown to strong Caesar. Perhaps Decius is suggesting here that today is where much gratefulness and examination will be given to Caesar, without a doubt not the risk of his prosperity as Calpurnia deciphers it. Caesar typically concurs with him, as most residents appreciate accepting the progressively positive of two translations. After Caesar's death at the hand of Brutus, Cassius, and the remainder of the backstabbers, Brutus and Cassius are pursued into the open country, where we see a couple of eccentric indications of their pending difficult demise in fight. In a fantasy, Brutus sees Caesar's phantom, deciphered as a sign of his thrashing. He likewise views the ensign, and rather than the typical load of falcons, ravens and kites supplant them, interpreted as another indication of their misfortune at Phillipi. As anyone might expect, Caesar's demise is retaliated for at long last, with two of the schemers, Titanius and Brutus' twofold self destruction. The play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare, obviously uncovers how significant notion was to the individuals of Rome at the hour of

Euthanasia4 essays

Euthanasia4 papers Killing keeps on being a very dubious issue in the public arena, and there are many restricting perspectives concerning this particular subject. The instance of Sue Rodriguez versus the territory of British Columbia, is one that shows the high level of discussion over such a delicate theme, as willful extermination. Coming up next is a scientific assessment of the current case, and a basic examination of it, to the speculations of Patrick Nowell-Smith. While relating the hypotheses of Patrick Nowell - Smith to the instance of Sue Rodriguez, it is apparent that he would not concur with the appointed authorities official conclusion. Initially, it is important to talk about a portion of the pertinent and huge purposes of the case. Sue Rodriguez is a mother in her forties, experiencing Lou Gehrigs sickness. Her future is a while, anyway her condition is disintegrating rapidly. Before long, she will not, at this point have the option to swallow, talk, walk or move, and she will require a respirator so as to breath. She will be out of commission. Sue Rodriguez knows about her circumstance and realizes that demise is inescapable, nonetheless, she wishes to control her conditions, and her time and way of death. When Sue is not, at this point ready to appreciate life, she will be truly unfit to end her existence with out help. Sue isn't mentioning that her passing be brought about by dynamic willful extermination, which would be by methods for a specialist genuinely taking her existence with some type of infusion. She is asking that a certified clinical doctor set up a specific innovative framework that would permit he r, on the off chance that she decided to, end her existence with her own hand. This is inactive willful extermination, as it permits the casualty herself to control the time and way of her own passing. The Criminal Code incorporates a segment with respect to the possibility of self destruction that the appointed authority lays before her trying to challenge her desires. Area 241 states that Every one who guides an individual to end it all or helps or abets someo... <!

A Critical Review of Andrea Owens’ “The Mortgage Bailout that Worked.”

While the Harvard Business Review (HBR) presently can't seem to distribute anything explicitly on the Obama Mortgage Stimulus Plan starting at yet, this ongoing web journal passage may give a thought with regards to what the HBR’s perspective may be. This is an intriguing piece, as it is an authentic exercise on contract bailout plans and how they may function. During the 1920s, land, as during the 1990s, was viewed as an exceptionally protected venture. In New York only before the incredible accident, a few dozen land surety organizations jumped up, offering what added up to â€Å"mutual funds† for putting resources into mortgages.These reserves were ensured by the protection division of the province of New York. Obviously, with a couple of years, these speculations sprang wild. Truth be told, the organizations themselves started to put resources into their own assurance plans. They charged an expense of generally 1% of the yearly enthusiasm on the paper (not the genui ne worth). When a log jam hit, the surety firms put their promoting plans into a higher rigging, selling increasingly more of them, in any event, waving their charge for a period. At the point when the breakdown stopped by 1932, the advertising went significantly higher, and more home loans were sold at increasingly more favorable rates.Some were seeing that these insurance firms were â€Å"on the hook† for some entirely flawed credits. They sold limited home loans to endeavor to take care of effectively expanded home loan esteems. It was a trick dependent on an untruth. In 1932, the organizations held the enormous whole of about $2. 7 billion in paper, that itself spoke to about $809 million in real worth. The last breakdown came in the Spring of 1935, lastly, the state stepped in. The measures the state took is actually the exercise here. To start with, the province of New York passed two laws. The first was the Mortgage Moratorium Act.This essentially expressed that the pr operty holder can't lose his home through dispossession insofar as the duties and intrigue were paid. Second, the state made an establishment called the home loan Commission whose activity it was to assume control over the home loans and try to recover their worth. The purpose of this last foundation was to keep up land esteems as near the numbers on the paper as could be expected under the circumstances. It is here where the state met with some achievement. This commission employed countless analysts and agents to find every single property that was spoken to (mutilations and all) on the now useless paper.Each property, when distinguished and evaluated, was to be discarded either through deal or rental. Those properties with incomplete upgrades were kept above water until the enhancements were done. The state aided any enhancements whatsoever on the properties that may keep up their worth. In any case, what is noteworthy is that, at any rate as indicated by the HBR, by 1935-1936, t he state had recovered about 84% of the paper estimation of these properties, which is very great given the idea of the scam.Now, that being stated, what are the issues that get from this comparative with Obama and the home loan upgrade/bailout? There are two: first, that the individuals who are associated with the bailout/improvement need to, similar to the province of New York numerous moons back, monitor all the properties that are recorded on the paper. What's more, second, that the bailout/upgrade cash be utilized to keep up property estimations to the best degree conceivable given the accessible liquidity. What the writers of such articles consistently overlook is that there are genuine individuals under this paper.People who have been exploited for the benefit of a couple. Here, criminal acts have been executed for fast benefits: as per normal procedure, it is the property holder, as opposed to the connivers, that is rebuffed. Thus, the rest of this paper will manage a few is sues that get from the upgrade and the verifiable interpretation of it from our picked creator. 1. Notwithstanding the idea of the improvement, all abandonments must be halted right away. It isn't the flaw fo the mortgage holder that they have been exploited of.Like the New York circumstance, no abandonments ought to continue regardless of whether the duties can't be paid. This is a type of repayment for the mortgage holder of the consolation of such hypothesis under the fake pennant of â€Å"the free market,† which is neither free nor a market: it is the state’s assurance of individual benefit. 2. All land assessments ought to be suspended for a solitary year. This will go about as a negative boost for property holders. That is, families that own their own homes ought to be liberated from land charges for a solitary year.Like the New York case during the 1930s, the truth of the matter is that the controllers and the state was sleeping at the worst possible time while the entirety of this was going on. The state, to a great extent hostage by the significant examiners, wouldn't make a move. Henceforth, the express that went about as a facilitator to these rascals/examiners. Thus, the state doesn't merit the prize of smooth duty assortment. On the off chance that there is to be a ban on dispossessions, at that point there likewise should be a crossing out of expenses on land for families who own homes, just as a dropping of any back charges on property, etc.3. In the event that the bailout is to continue, at that point notwithstanding the abovementioned, the checks (which speak to their own cash at any rate) ought to be made out to the mortgage holder, and not to the connivers or â€Å"guaranty firms. † 4. While it may sound extraordinary, the rascals and their holders on ought to be condemned to work camps for their job in the trick. In the event that these individuals see cash as the consequence of trick, at that point they should be encou raged that the beginning of significant worth is work, that is, work. Work, not extravagant money related footwork, is the wellspring of wealth.The go betweens and examiners simply move it around. On the off chance that the estimation of the paper in their grasp doesn't coordinate the genuine estimation of the land, that missing worth didn't vanish, it only changed hands. The above thoughts as far as the bailout/boost itself, in this manner, ought to be associated with recovering that esteem and moving it to the citizen and mortgage holder. The reality remains that the white collar class property holder doesn't have an intrigue gathering or anteroom that ensures them. The connivers do, and the poor do, yet the white collar class citizen doesn't. 5.If the boost is to proceed, at that point it appears to be sensible to hold tha a specific level of the cash ought to go to carrying the poor into the positions f the working class by sponsoring their entrance into home proprietorship and budgetary strength. By a similar toke, the condition of obligation of the working class ought to likewise be reduced with this equivalent cash. In such a case, it will be a bailout in the most genuine feeling of the word: not a bailout fo the money related framework, however of individual poor and white collar class citizens whose surplus worth has been transported to abroad assessment safe houses and â€Å"foundations.† The truth here is that this emergency is foundational, not aberrational. The HBR’s essential sin is that they demand that this trick isn't incorporated with the framework, however the consequence of a bunch of criminal personalities. In this they are incorrect. The framework has this sort of trick incorporated with its very idea of significant worth. The issues that can â€Å"unpack† this announcement can be summed up along these lines: 1. The topic of significant worth: the control of the estimation of work is isolated from the genuine demonstr ation of work and work. As such, the estimation of work is taken by the rogues and controlled for their own profit.But the truth of the matter is that that worth isn't theirs, yet the work that has made it in any case: this incorporates the real physical work of building a house, yet in addition the scholarly work that gives the plans, the geology, the outlines, and so on. The overflow estimation of their work is taken by any semblance of Madoff, and afterward bet against other comparable accomplishments of work. The truth of the matter is that this overflow esteem has a place with nobody yet the work that made it. Subsequently, the trick is incorporated with the framework, and not aberrational. 2.Hence, if charges and dispossessions are completely killed by state fiat (for a specific measure of time) it is simply a matter of monetary reparation, not an a blessing, or a sort of state kindheartedness. This cash and the work it speaks to has a place with the white collar class. Conseq uently it is their own cash that is being come back to them. 3. The worry in money related circles isn't creation. The whole purpose of work is to make things out of their regular express that makes life simpler for humankind. While this appears to be rudimentary, the Wall Street mindset has no understanding of it.Speculation itself is a sort of perplexity in that hypothesis involves betting paper (truth be told, speaking to work on the ground) against different bits of paper speaking to something very similar. When the estimation of this paper is expanded because of handy betting, who is to pay? Exactly the same individuals who made the genuine (I. e. non paper) esteem in any case. Thusly, the subject of the bailout improvement is lost, except if it points not at the home loan industry or fund all in all, yet the white collar class whose interminable condition of obligation is being exacerbated by increasingly more taxes.While it remains the cases that the framework itself is liabl e for the emergency, the working class, consistently n the post for a decent arrangement, verified they were obvious objectives for the trick. Be that as it may, this isn't the flaw of this classâ€the very spine of home-possession. Consequently, the rogues should be rebuffed, and the misled rescued, not the opposite way around. Worth must be rejoined to the genuine capacity of work, as opposed to the anecdotal estimation of paper.

Ethics, Professionalism and Contemporary Issues Essay

Morals, Professionalism and Contemporary Issues - Essay Example All through the structure ventures, there were minor contemplations of the potential dangers this game stances to the players, most definitely. In any case, a concerned player of my web based game, who is worried about the human dealing issue, raised his authentic worries about my game inclining the youthful players to human dealing, subsequent to being tricked into this present reality gatherings. The worries of this player ought not be ignored, however considered truly. This is on the grounds that, with the modernity of innovation, human dealing has exploited and thrived. As it is all inclusive known, human dealing is the unlawful exchange of individuals with the target of offering them to constrained work, sexual servitude or tissue or organ extraction. Human dealing is done through intimidation, utilization of power, kidnapping, buys or misdirection (Latonero 8). It has become a rewarding business for certain individuals notwithstanding being unlawful and uncaring. This suggests clients of the web and different advances should be wary. How Technology has supported it Human dealing is uncontrolled particularly through innovation. Numerous individuals fall prey of this heartless practice through compulsion and misdirection, to present their subtleties and address lines over the web. From that point, the dealers lay a snare for the blameless web clients, steal them, and exchange them off (Latonero 10). The patterns in instruction have required the appropriation of innovation in research and correspondence. Money related imperatives among numerous individuals have additionally propelled them to grasp innovation for arrangements. In this manner, as specialists and understudies look for research and scholastic arrangements, they likewise look for business openings. With this pattern in the utilization of innovation, human dealers have figured out how to lay snares through online adverts and phony business openings, which have caught numerous individuals, includin g youngsters and youths. The vast majority of the casualties are exchanged for sexual bondage, where they are auctions off as whores. This clarifies why most casualties have been ladies, the two grown-ups and teenagers. In this cutting edge hello tech society, innovation has been the main influencer and road for human dealing (Latonero 11). How Technology ruined it However, in spite of the fruitful endeavors by human dealers, to construct their business domains in this unlawful exchange, innovation has additionally been instrumental in battling this business. Since human dealing turned into a worldwide issue, security offices have likewise come up emphatically, to follow and catch human dealers. Most dealers do their business on the web. Along these lines, the security organizations have likewise arrangement traps on the web, to find them. This has been helped by the web convention (IP) addresses, which permits the area of anybody utilizing the web universally. Innovation has additi onally permitted the following of the clients of correspondence devices like cell phones universally. Security specialists can likewise block telephone discussions of suspected dealers. Obviously, the dealers have learned methods of getting away from dread by utilizing false names and concealing the conventions. This has been the best difficulty in the endeavors, to battle human dealing through innovation. In any case, still innovation has made it simple for the security operators, to battle this unlawful business. With improved innovation, recordings and photographs can be taken by means of the satellite, which help following of these hoodlums. Conceivable arrangement of activities and investigation Following the danger from

Get psyched, stay with it, do whatever it takes

Get psyched, stay with it, do whatever it takes I have to admit that I dont have fifty pieces of advice for anybody, but I do have a couple of things to say about starting college, particularly at the only college about which I know anything substantial. The most succinct advice I can give is from Adams dad (my future father-in-law, yay!), who has three pieces of advice which he applies to every situation anyone in our family encounters. 1. Get psyched. 2. Stay with it. 3. Do whatever it takes. I think this is superb advice. My advice is a lot more wordy (surprise surprise). The most important thing you will learn at MIT will be how to fail. Okay, one time I said that the most important thing youll learn is how to ask for help. And thats still true, but I guess the failing part happens before the asking for help part, so the failing gets to be primary. This might sound surprising, since people seem to think that the most important thing theyll learn in college is how to design a robot, or how to calculate the thermodynamic properties of a chemical reaction, or how to succinctly prove that If an integer n is greater than 2, then an + bn = cn has no solutions in non-zero integers a, b, and c. Well, it just aint so. I mean, if the cold hard facts were the important thing, you could save your tuition money and get your education via OCW or the NCBI Bookshelf. But an MIT education explicitly sets out to teach you how to think, and how to approach thinking, and how to take things you dont know and turn them into things you do know. And how to fail. If youre going to be a practicing scientist or engineer, you need to learn how to fall flat on your face. Despite the best intellectual efforts of any given scientist, lab work fails at least half of the time. Sometimes it fails even more than that. Sometimes the scientist can figure out whats wrong and take steps to fix the problem, but much of the time, hed be just as well off chanting incantations and waving religious amulets. (Some scientists I know recently put up in their lab a statue of St. Jude patron saint of lost causes next to a picture of Thoth, the Egyptian god of knowledge, figuring that plurality could only be a good thing for their protocols.) Failures just as necessary a skill in engineering, or business, or life. Nobodys successful all of the time. So what you need to learn how to do is fail, but not let failure get you down. You have to realize that something that I did failed is not the same as I am a failure, even if you have to tell yourself a hundred times before you believe it. You have to realize that being the best at everything you ever do doesnt mean youre amazing it means youre afraid to take chances. Almost everybody fails a test or two their first term freshman year at MIT. A lot of people fail a whole class or two. This is okay its pass/no record! Live it up. Youll figure out what you need to do to get the grades you want, and youll do it, and everything will be okay. And, of course, when youre stuck in your UROP lab doing a reaction for the nth time because you just cant get it to work well, Ive been there too. (Actually, Ive been there a lot.) Try to resist the urge to punch a machine, because theyre very expensive. Questions 1. Leo (after reading my directions to Target stores in the Boston area) asked, I checked all the bus stops and places you linked, man, I feel so powerless without a car. Isnt there a delivery-to-door option offered by some of the superstores? Theres always online ordering. :) I order stuff online quite a bit, and even though I hate paying shipping, its easier than carving out a chunk of the day to get to the store and back on the T. I will note, though, that a nonzero number of students do have cars, and most are more than happy to take a Target trip on a Saturday or something. My designated drivers are Rachel 07 and Woody 08 Rachel takes me to Target, and Woody takes big groups of people out to IHOP and Outback Steakhouse. 2. Charlotte noted, A short note to all- having a safe campus doesnt mean one should lower his/her guard, take care, especially if youre a girl (sigh). As Adam says, dont wander around by yourself drunk at night with money hanging out of your pockets. ;) You should always be aware of your surroundings Bostons a pretty safe city, but it is a city after all. 3. Al asked, is transfering to MIT hard than entering as a freshmen? In terms of admission percentages, yes. About 14% of freshman applicants were accepted last year, but only about 5% of transfer applicants were admitted and thats actually somewhat high for the transfer admission rate. Not many students leave MIT, so there arent very many spots open for transfers, unfortunately. 4. I think Colin gave a great response to Ajas question (and Ankits, too), so you should go look at it if youre wondering how to make yourself shine in the application. :)

Nature versus Nurture

Nature versus nurture. This has been a topic of debate for centuries. Years have passà © still not been found regarding this issue. This is an argumentation of the utmost significance, not only because of its anthropological meaning, that will help us understand where we come from and how our personality is formed, but also because of the moral, political, ethical, educational, social, and statistical issues that it discusses. The nature side of the polemic says that humans behave as they do according to heredity, or even animal instincts. The nurture side believes that people think and behave certain ways because they are taught to do so. Neither of the above is the correct answer to the question, â€Å"Why do we behave like that? â€Å" The accurate answer is that heredity, meaning nature, is a true fact, but it has a role of â€Å"basis†, in the building of our mind and personality. The biggest impact in our development is the environment in which we live and grow up: t he nurture side. Therefore, nature is mostly influenced by nurture. Many scientists and authors have been arguing for the correct side, between nature and nurture. For example, William Golding, the English writer who wrote the book, Lord Of The Flies, states generally that every man has a capacity to be â€Å"evil† from the beginning of his life. This statement shows that from the point of view of Golding, every person has an inherited characteristic, which would basically mean he is on the nature side of the debate. Another notable person that agreed with the nature side of the polemic was the scientist, Francis Galton, cousin of Charles Darwin, the famous naturalist. Galton was the man who first started the debate between hereditarians, a group of people who believe that heredity determinates our human nature, and environmentalists, people who believe that our environment has the biggest impact on our development. In 1865, he began to study heredity, basically the idea of nature. This was partly influenced by reading Darwin's publication, Origin of Species. This â€Å"thirst† for knowledge led him to do very significant and important studies, the twin studies, hoping to find the different contributions of nature and nurture. His huge contribution to the debate, especially to the nature side, proves that he agreed with the theory of heredity. As mentioned earlier, Galton had a cousin named Charles Darwin. He was a British naturalist and big defender of the nature side of the debate. According to the Indian University Archives, without Darwin there would be no nature vs. nurture debate. Darwin wrote various pages on his autobiography about his family’s contributions to his intelligence. However, he attributed his intellectual success on nature, not nurture. Proof is provided by, this sentence that he wrote about his brother: â€Å"†¦I do not think that I owe much to him intellectually-nor to my four sisters†¦I am inclined t o agree with Francis Galton in believing that education and environment produce only a small effect on the mind of any one, and that most of our qualities are innate â€Å"(Darwin, 43). Darwin believed that intelligent behavior came from the instincts of our previous, nonhuman ancestors. This proves that Charles Darwin, one of the brightest minds of the 19th century believed in the nature part of the argumentation. The point clearly stated through these three examples is that, the genetic predisposition (heredity) is real. Genetic predisposition may be a fact, but it isn’t the reason why we behave the way we do. Heredity is only the basis. The formation of ourselves is due to the environment in which we grow up. An example of this theory is shown, Lord of the Flies. In the book, a group of kids find themselves all alone on an island. In this group we find different characters with diverse personalities and manners. Also, as previously mentioned, Golding, the author of the book, believed that everybody has the capacity of being evil. The kids in the story start developing that initial evil due to the new environment in which they live. A hostile, unknown, scary and dangerous environment; leads to the development of an aggressive and violent comportment. In the book, we see that in the first chapters, Jack is a born leader with self-control. Generally he appears as a normal kid. But, as the story progresses, and the kids find new problems on the island, he starts developing â€Å"his evil†. At the end, he becomes a belligerent and confrontational leader of a violent mob. The new environment in which he lives causes this enormous change in his personality. Another example situated in the book is the case of Ralph. He is also a born leader, a boy who listens to reason and logic, and someone who always finds solutions to his problems. But, in this new environment, as the kids around him start being â€Å"evil†, he starts losing his self- control, and develops a new character, where he is not the boy that he was before. This change occurs when Ralph joins Jack’s mob and starts dancing with them: â€Å"Piggy and Ralph under the threat of the sky, found themselves eager to take a place in this demented but partly secured society â€Å"(Golding, 152) . The last example is the case of Piggy. He is a tormented kid, a victim of bullying, but deep down he is a smart boy. In the book he finds himself being insulted by Jack all the time. For instance when Jack says: â€Å"Better call you Piggy than Fatty â€Å" (Golding, 26 ) . The results of this bullying are that he can’t say his opinion or ideas when he is around of Jack, opinions that could be very helpful sometimes. But later in the story, when Jack leaves the group, and the environment of their small society becomes more friendly and calm, he feels more free and happy and he finally express his opinion and shows his intelligent ideas to everybody, so b asically the change of environment change him too. The point I want to make with my examples, is that, we may all have, a â€Å"groundwork† , our initial nature that we inherited from our parents, but the biggest impact in the development of our personality is the environment in which we grow up, which can completely change us, like the characters in Lord Of The Flies†¦ Supporting my theory, Judith Rich Harris, the author of the book : The Nurture Assumption: Why Children Turn Out the Way They Do . She generally says in her book that she challenges the idea that the personality of adults is determined chiefly by the way they were raised by their parents. She also says that the role of genetics in personality has long been accepted in psychological research, however, even identical twins, which share the same genes, are not exactly alike, so inheritance is not all. Another example that proves the theory that nurture has the most impact in our personality is the case of G enie. Genie was a girl who spent nearly all her childhood inside a bedroom. She was a victim of one of the most severe cases of social isolation in American history (ABCnews). The police discovered her in 1970 after spending all her life tide to a chair. The result of this loneliness, was that she was unable to speak, walk, socialize, and generally being normal after being rescued. We can see, that due to the fact that she was in an isolated and lonely environment her attitude and personality weren’t usual, so this proves that the environment in which somebody lives has a direct connection with his/hers development, even if she inherited a bright and regular attitude from her family. To finish ill say that heredity is a well known, scientifically proved, theory. A fact. But without the help of nurture, it isn’t accurate. We become who we are, and we act the way we do because we are taught to do so. That’s how we learned .It doesn’t matter how our genes are, and what we inherited from our parents. The environment in which we live in will define us. â€Å"Genetic predisposition is not destiny â€Å" David Kranzler